Make Yourself

What a long strange trip it's been…

Wikis in the Classroom

Again, I find that I’m becoming more and more a fan of using advanced technology like this in the classroom. Every chapter in Richardson’s text gives me better and newer ideas of what to do and what works well within a classroom–this is one book that I definitely won’t be selling back! Giving students a forum where they can really feel empowered to stretch their writing/editing muscles just makes sense to me and again, it’s using a forum that they are already comfortable and familiar with. We as teachers in the 21st century have to find a way to integrate old school learning with new school education or else we’re going to lose our students. I think that old methods alienate rather than encourage (at least, I know that I used to hate to do in the library what I could do faster and better online) advanced learning–learning past what the curriculum tells us to teach.

On another note, I’ve always been a fan of Wikipedia. I’ve never come across a page that has given me blatantly false information and I can usually use good old common sense (or a few extra minutes of research) to determine when I need to delve a little deeper or when I should take it at its word. And yeah, students might not be as discerning as us when it comes to true/false information, but we can teach them to develop those skills. I mean, someone’s going to have to, so why not us? Even if they don’t master that particular skill, at least they will have been exposed to having to sort through multiple editors, sources, and writing forms to determine which is right.

Wikis seem to be a great way to really give the lesson back to the student and put them in control of how much they take from a lesson. I’m really just excited to be learning all these alternative ways to teach!

Advertisement

3 Comments»

  courtneycalvo wrote @

I think wikipedia is a great place for students to START researching a project, but like Richardson notes, wikipedia is meant to be neutral. I want my students to read thesis-driven pieces that force them to think, not just regurgitate information.

  allison008 wrote @

Courtney–I totally agree with you. Regurgitating information isn’t a helpful way for anyone to really come away with something substantial from a learning standpoint. But I think that Wikipedia gives students the chance to see people like themselves furthering the learning experiences of others simply by participating in a community of information. I think that’s why I’m a fan of the open-natured atmosphere of Wikipedia.

  dc wrote @

I like your emphasis on “common sense” when it comes to evaluating any sort of information…we tend to treat more commonly accepted info-sources (TV news, newspapers, magazines, encyclopedias) at face value, when it’s just as valuable to ask probing questions about such media as well.

dc


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.